+1 for renaming to container-controler and both under modules
2014-02-10 12:28 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > -1 for cdi unit (name already in use for the exact same purpose) > > +1 for renaming cdictrl to container-control > > +1 for aligning both under modules (even though cdictrl has no deps on > core, making it a module makes it easier to understand from a user's > point of view). > > Personally, since it's an upgrade of the version # people just need to > be aware of it when doing the upgrade locally in their projects (e.g. > we can put some notes out there on what needs to be done to upgrade). > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: > > test-control could be renamed cdi-unit or something like it IMHO > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > 2014-02-10 11:28 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected] > >: > >> i wouldn't move test-control, since it's a module based on > deltaspike-core. > >> (cdictrl isn't based on deltaspike-core.) > >> > >> regards, > >> gerhard > >> > >> > >> > >> 2014-02-10 11:15 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> Well, cdictrl is released already. Thus I would rather not change it's > >>> name. > >>> test-control is not yet released. So that would be easier to change. > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sunday, 9 February 2014, 20:16, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > > >>> >I know it's been discussed before but now with a module called > >>> test-control > >>> >it just feel unnecessary to be inconsistent even though cdiCtrl is > not a > >>> >module it's not so pretty... > >>> > > >>> >Cheers / Karl > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >
