+1 John
+1 for using the logo in the header

2014-02-10 14:59 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>:

> Project name was already established as a part of graduation.  Unless
> we see a need to have a rename, we should stick with it (a good
> example of why a rename is needed is OpenEJB -> TomEE).
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Karl Kildén <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hello! By following the discussions you seem to draw closer and closer to
> > 1.0. I think it would be appropriate to end the project name (or was that
> > settled?) and logotype discussions before.
> >
> > I myself is -1 for name change and +1 for the logotype that's currently
> in
> > the header
> >
> > Cheers!
>

Reply via email to