@logo:
i hope we will see some nice suggestions soon (see [1]).

regards,
gerhard

[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DESIGN-520



2014-02-10 15:03 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>:

> +1 John
> +1 for using the logo in the header
>
>
> 2014-02-10 14:59 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>:
>
> > Project name was already established as a part of graduation.  Unless
> > we see a need to have a rename, we should stick with it (a good
> > example of why a rename is needed is OpenEJB -> TomEE).
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Karl Kildén <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hello! By following the discussions you seem to draw closer and closer
> to
> > > 1.0. I think it would be appropriate to end the project name (or was
> that
> > > settled?) and logotype discussions before.
> > >
> > > I myself is -1 for name change and +1 for the logotype that's currently
> > in
> > > the header
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> >
>

Reply via email to