I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what the new qualifier is.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <cody.le...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S) > > -C > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >> +1 >> >> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand >> <anto...@sabot-durand.net> wrote: >> >> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of >> DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features. >>> >>> >>> >>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit >>>: >>> >>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?", >>>>>> I'd like to call a vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is >>>>>> redudant: >>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext. >>>>>> >>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future. >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) Should we replace it? >>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Thomas >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>
