+1 Romain

2014-02-24 21:11 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:

> yes but until now everybody seems ok
>
> if we have multiple proposal we can see if we do another vote or if
> some change their vote, no?
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2014-02-24 21:00 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>:
> > As per OP email, it's only a proposed value.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no?
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-02-24 17:24 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>:
> >>> I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is
> >>> not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO
> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what
> >>>>> the new qualifier is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <cody.le...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -C
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> anto...@sabot-durand.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage
> co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
> >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really
> need @Web?",
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because
> @Web is
> >>>>>>>>>>> redudant:
> >>>>>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the
> future.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
>

Reply via email to