Hi Mark!



On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> cdictrl-servlet directly defines cdi-1.0 artifacts. This breaks Weld-1.2
> and OWB-2.x.
>

Yes, I was thinking that as well.  Probably don't need a dependency on
CDI-1.0 APIs anyways.  I can remove that.  However, as far as I know this
doesn't break CDI 1.1/1.2 compatibility.  I've built it locally on OWB
1.2.x, Weld 1.1.10, 2.2.1 all seemed fine.  I'm actually running a perf
test against Weld 2.2.3 on one of my apps via the module this weekend.


>
> The whole module is actually pretty weird.
>
> It is a submodule of cdictrl but I seems to have not much to do with
> cdictrl. Instead it even has dependencies to deltaspike-core...
>
>
I'm not sure what you mean here.  It declares a dependency on cdictrl-api,
not deltaspike-core.  See [1].


> How do we proceed?
> Sorry that this slipped through our quality control.
>
>
Well, I first proposed this back in March/April.  Little feedback was
given.  If you have other issues with it, please don't hesitate to drop a
mail or raise a JIRA ticket.


>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>

- John

[1]:
https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/deltaspike/cdictrl/servlet/pom.xml

Reply via email to