Looks good to me.

On 28 Aug 2014, at 18:03, Rafael Benevides <benevi...@redhat.com> wrote:

> I believe that the work for the asciidoc documentation is ready!
> 
> Please, check this generated asciidcotor page: 
> http://deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/container-control-test.html
> 
> The branch with the source code is here: 
> https://github.com/rafabene/deltaspike/tree/documentation/documentation
> 
> 
> Em 8/27/14, 18:14, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
>> Yeap. I have to agree with you.
>> 
>> So I've changed my strategy...
>> 
>> I've taken your PoC and made some minor modifications and place it on my 
>> branch: 
>> https://github.com/rafabene/deltaspike/tree/documentation/documentation
>> 
>> Note that I'm using the agreed path for documentation folder and that I also 
>> included a Readme.md that instructs how to setup the credentials on 
>> ~/.m2/settings.xml and what maven command that should be used to deploy.
>> 
>> The result was published here: 
>> http://deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/container-control-test.html
>> 
>> What is missing now is the generated html template/styles.
>> 
>> 
>> Em 8/27/14, 17:23, John D. Ament escreveu:
>>> IMHO, the current approach is a bit safer and more testable.  running mvn 
>>> site will generate the asciidoc.  That would be a bit harder to do if we 
>>> need to support running it as a part of a staging pull.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Rafael Benevides <benevi...@redhat.com 
>>> <mailto:benevi...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>    I was trying to avoid two steps to deploy:
>>> 
>>>    1 - mvn site-deploy on git repo to copy it to the CMS staging are
>>>    2 - CMS deploy to publish it
>>> 
>>>    But I think that should not be a problem, Right?
>>> 
>>>    So what I'll do now, based on your PoC is to make the templates of
>>>    the generated html to be close to deltaspike site style.
>>> 
>>>    Em 8/27/14, 17:10, John D. Ament escreveu:
>>>>    Rafael,
>>>> 
>>>>    This shouldn't be needed any longer.  Based on what I did, we can
>>>>    now do a mvn site-deploy to copy everything into the CMS staging
>>>>    area.  Once verified go into CMS and do a publish.
>>>> 
>>>>    John
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Rafael Benevides
>>>>    <benevi...@redhat.com <mailto:benevi...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>        Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>>        This email is just to give a feedback about making CMS to
>>>>        work with Github and Asciidoc.
>>>> 
>>>>        Finally  I was able to understand enough how CMS works and
>>>>        probably I'm stopped where John Ament was.
>>>> 
>>>>        What I'm doing now is writing a GitUtil Perl Module that will
>>>>        be hosted at
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/site/trunk/lib/
>>>>        that will be responsible for cloning the documentation (on
>>>>        deltaspike git repo) and then another module will run the
>>>>        build (asciidoc to html) just for [<git_root>/documentation/].
>>>> 
>>>>        The idea is that the final documentation gets hosted at
>>>>        deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/
>>>>        <http://deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/> (note the sub
>>>>        folder).
>>>> 
>>>>        Further steps: Prepare a template so asciidoc generated html
>>>>        uses the same style of deltaspike.apache.org
>>>>        <http://deltaspike.apache.org>.
>>>> 
>>>>        Well, the idea here is to make everyone aware about this and
>>>>        also say that if is there anybody if Perl knowledge, you're
>>>>        welcome to give some hints!
>>>> 
>>>>        Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>        --
>>>>        *Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
>>>>        JBoss Developer
>>>>        M: +55-61-9269-6576 <tel:%2B55-61-9269-6576>
>>>> 
>>>>        Red Hat
>>>> 
>>>>        Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>>>        collaboration.
>>>>        See how it works at www.redhat.com <http://www.redhat.com/>
>>>> 
>>>>        LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/3258288> Youtube
>>>>        <https://www.youtube.com/redhatlatam>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to