+1

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]
> wrote:

> finally this mail arrived twice...
> in the other thread we already have 3x +1 for v1.4.0 -> i'll add your
> opinions their once i send the conclusion.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2015-05-02 23:27 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>:
>
> > Agreed looks like a 1.3.1 to me.
> >
> > On Sat, May 2, 2015, 17:09 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yep didnt see sthg justifying an upgrade for me. What would justify it
> > for
> > > a user - ie not for us.
> > >  Le 2 mai 2015 23:03, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]>
> a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > @romain:
> > > > see e.g.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312820&version=12327249
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > gerhard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2015-05-02 22:48 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]
> >:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy
> > module
> > > is
> > > > > enough by itself so would be +0 ATM for me.
> > > > > hi @ all,
> > > > >
> > > > > if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
> > > > > >before< the next release.
> > > > >
> > > > > reasons:
> > > > >  - the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
> > > > >  - we added several new features
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > > gerhard
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Jason Porter
http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp

Reply via email to