Gerhard,
We are attempting to provide feedback as we have time. There was quite a bit of confusion for a couple of days as we naturally presumed our problems were of our own making. So, until such time as Amita (a.k.a. “akm”) is able to get us “back-on-track” and subsequently provide concrete examples… my suggestion was (and is) to remove 1.4.2 from circulation. Note: We would like to think that our problems are similar to Harald’s… however, we have no definitive understanding of Harald’s problems. Is that available? _Marvin ------------------------------------------ | USA Cell: 248.866.4897 | Email: <mailto:marvint...@gtcgroup.com> mar...@gtcgroup.com | Web: <http://marvintoll.com/> http://MarvinToll.com | Skype: marvin.toll ------------------------------------------ Pattern Enabled Development ® (PED) - <http://pedcentral.com/> http://pedCentral.com PED seeks to advance Java/JavaScript application construction by inspiring software engineers with Pattern First Thinking, enabling project teams with a Pattern Palette, and harmonizing enterprise communication with a Unified Pattern Language. From: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:13 AM To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org; Marvin Toll <marvint...@gtcgroup.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0 hi marvin, please provide concrete details and maybe even tests which illustrate the issue. only with such tests, we can improve our test-suite over time. (if you are facing the same issue as harald: we will fix it with v1.5.1.) regards, gerhard 2015-08-12 14:53 GMT+02:00 Marvin Toll <marvint...@gtcgroup.com <mailto:marvint...@gtcgroup.com> >: An update from an unspecified Motor Company: We made the decision to roll-back from 1.4.2 to 1.4.0 this morning... as we had skipped 1.4.1. I'd suggest that you pull 1.4.2... as it now appears this release broke about 50 of our Reference Application JUnit tests. _Marvin -----Original Message----- From: Harald Wellmann [mailto:hwellmann...@gmail.com <mailto:hwellmann...@gmail.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:30 PM To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org <mailto:dev@deltaspike.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0 Hi Gerhard, I compared to 1.4.1 because that's the last known good version, 1.4.2 broke my application already (DELTASPIKE-965), After some analysis, I believe the "new regressions" I reported yesterday were introduced in 1.4.2 and not in 1.5.0 - I wasn't able to see them with 1.4.2 due to that first blocker (or maybe I should have looked more closely). The point is, the behavior of EntityRepository.save() has changed in an incompatible way which is likely to break some other applications (not just mine). I now change my vote to +1, seeing that this 1.5.0 candidate is an improvement over 1.4.2, but that does not mean that all is well - we need to sort out a couple of issues related to save(). I'll start a separate thread on that, to keep the discussion focused. Regards, Harald
