@thomas:
we could do that, however, we would need to check several topics (e.g.: the
overhead and possible side-effects with bv v1.1+).

regards,
gerhard



2015-08-21 19:18 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:

> shouldnt a runtime validation be done as well?
>
> +1 to support/tolerate server upgrade without repackaging
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-08-21 10:17 GMT-07:00 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]
> >:
>
> > IMO the module should work on both EE6 and EE7.
> > We often provide a WAR file and the customers decide where to deploy it.
> >
> > 2015-08-21 19:00 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]
> >:
> >
> > > @ee6 only: that's correct
> > > however, it looks like that user is using a manual setup with bv v1.1.
> > > -> we need to add that information to the documentation (about ee6 and
> bv
> > > v1.0) and/or we validate the bv-api with an extension.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2015-08-21 17:35 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > Yeap.
> > > >
> > > > You right!
> > > >
> > > > In this case I think we should drop a note at
> > > > http://deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/bean-validation.html
> about
> > > it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:16 AM, John D. Ament <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Rafael,
> > > > >
> > > > > The bean validation module should not be used in EE 7 app servers,
> it
> > > was
> > > > > meant to plug a hole in EE 6 containers to continue to leverage
> > > injection
> > > > > into EE 6 constraint validators (a need I had at the time, which is
> > now
> > > > > replaced by using an EE 7 container).
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:09 AM Rafael Benevides <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yesterday Gerhard asked me to take a look at the following issue:
> > > > > > https://github.com/jpangamarca/bean-validation-shutdown-issue
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After some investigation I found that ConstraintValidatorFactory
> > > > > included a
> > > > > > new method in Java EE 7 (#releaseInstance
> > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/validation/ConstraintValidatorFactory.html#releaseInstance-javax.validation.ConstraintValidator-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > )
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - ConstraintValidatorFactory (Java EE 6):
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/validation/ConstraintValidatorFactory.html
> > > > > > - ConstraintValidatorFactory (Java EE 7):
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/validation/ConstraintValidatorFactory.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This email is to discuss the expected approach for this issue:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) Create a new artifact for Java EE
> > > > > > 7: deltaspike-bean-validation-module-impl-ee7
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2) Upgrade the current supported version to BV 1.1 (Java EE 7)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3) Others.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So What are your thoughts about this issue and what's the
> approach
> > > that
> > > > > > DeltaSpike is using to leave with changes from  EE6 to EE7?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
> > > > > > JBoss Developer Materials lead
> > > > > > M: +1-919-592-6255
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
> > > > collaboration.
> > > > > > See how it works at www.redhat.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
> > > > JBoss Developer Materials lead
> > > > M: +1-919-592-6255
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
> > collaboration.
> > > > See how it works at www.redhat.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to