+1
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. > There are 2 more team members though the minimum 3 votes are so far > reached. > There will be separate votes on artifacts to be released, this is just the > necessary legal foundation for any of these W3C modules to remain at > DeviceMap and for calling DeviceMap as a whole "W3C compliant" without > lying;-) > > W3C DDR Simple API is the only formal recommendation in this area: > http://www.w3.org/TR/#tr_Device_Description_Repository > Even the Device Description Structure (which "data" is based on or at least > inspired by) was only a Working Draft, and both OpenDDR and DeviceMap have > since continued that work (a "draft" makes that easier than a final spec;-) > > Werner > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Radu Cotescu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > On 21 Jan 2015 18:55, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Here's the updated notice with the necessary parts and phrase as > > > discussed... > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > -Bertrand > > > > > >
