Sorry, my apologies, browsermap has been released. http://devicemap.apache.org/download/
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> wrote: > So I just want to have a final discussion here before I come to my own > personal conclusions regarding my role in this project. This way moving > forward will be more clear. > > So it seems like there are 2 project directions being proposed: > > One direction, supported by Werner and Bertrand, has this project > positioned as offering and supporting multiple device detection clients. So > I like to think of it as a device detection api buffet, a product polyglot > even. Our users simply choose an option as they see fit. The clients that > exist are the legacy OpenDDR client (not sure what else to call it since > there is no official release other than source code in github and apache > svn), the 1.x Java client released under DeviceMap, a cloned .NET client, > and Browsermap, a javascript client which I believe is in an un released > state. Obviously my 2.0 work could fall under this as well. > > The other direction, which is the direction I supported, is moving away > from all the above clients and starting fresh with a 2.0 framework of a > client specification. The device data would be migrated to pattern domains > and we would expand to browsers, operating systems, and potentially other > new domains. The specification will allow for clients to be written and > tested in a language and domain independent way. All the above clients in > the first point (OpenDDR, DeviceMap 1.x, browsermap, etc) will no longer be > supported and users will have to use them as released or migrate to 2.0. > The same goes for the device data, new work would be on the 2.0 domains and > no backporting would be planned. > > Even if we all come to agreement here, I am not making any promises > regarding my role moving forward. I just want to have a clear, level headed > discussion using facts and opinions. If other people here have other views > or opinions, share them. >
