Thanks, that also answers if and how Adobe may currently use it. Unlike commercial closed-source vendors, I am not aware, that Apache projects put references on their sites (only sponsors are mentioned, we discussed this, though I don't think the site ever reflected it) However like benchmarks a certain list of known references can't hurt. Aside from open source projects or blogs, who tend to be a little more open to "new fancy stuff" especially large corporate clients are much more conservative, which is why breaking with backward-compatibility or tying a certain client to certain data sets seems acceptable, if we can't handle flexibility like e.g. DetectRight or others do, but expecially business critical users must have a choice whether they want to use a 1.x format (closer to W3C especially the XML structure) or move to something else. There it's usually up to a project having to change an existing system while they just want updates or improvements to the existing device data if provided without touching the code in production.
Werner On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> wrote: > > ..So if you want... (im looking at you Werner and Bertrand), please lay > out > > what you see as your dev roadmap for the next year(s)... > > That's a great question, let's discuss concrete plans, as in "what > code or data do you expect to produce in the next few months". > > For me it hasn't changed: I joined this PMC when graduating mostly out > of loyalty to this project's stakeholders, as having an ASF member in > each project is good. But I'm not planning to be active on code or > data here at the moment. > > I'm happy to help you guys in terms of community and ASF > "administrative" activities, but that's it. My activities have changed > a bit since DeviceMap started incubating in January 2012, I'm not > using any of this stuff in my work at the moment. > > -Bertrand >
