Sorry, I do not want to volunteer this time. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Volkan, > > Thanks for the update. The CFPs for these events end by June 30, so > wondering if you'd consider one of these events to propose as co-speaker > (DevoXX BE is in Antwerp, ApacheCon Europe in Budapest again) ? I know, > ApacheCon offers travel support to those who needed it, DevoXX at most > gives you a conference pass if they accepted a talk for the main conference > program. > > Showing 2.0 may not work by the end of the year, but explaining what new > features are planned for it certainly would work and e.g. at ApacheCon > Europe clearly got a better chance of being accepted again than if we just > said "not much has changed";-) > > WDYT? > > Werner > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello Werner, > > > > For the last two days I was at GOTO conference, hence next week I need to > > burn the remaining stories in the Sprint backlog. And for the following > > week I am going for a small vacation. > > > > I was waiting for 2.0 release preparation so I can contribute some code > to > > the Java client. (In the meantime, people at bol.com were complaining a > > little bit about DM's falling short of resolving incoming user agents > > properly. I will investigate that issue too in the next week.) > > > > Best. > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > There are roughly 2 weeks left to submit abstracts to ACE. I have not > > > heard, of other team members e.g. Volkan would like to propose > something > > > together. > > > With enough notice, we can circulate a draft either here or on > > > devicemap-private (not sure, if e.g. Volkan who is committer but not on > > PMC > > > could subscribe to it or already has?) before actually submitting it. > > > > > > As Bertand mentioned, we might also have others contribute to slides, > but > > > only once we know, if it's approved or not;-) > > > > > > While competition is often tough (especially Antwerp), I could propose > to > > > DevoXX BE or MO (formerly JMaghreb), too, their CPF deadline is nearly > > > identical. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > There is a lot of info here: > > > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/devicemap/DataSpec2 > > > > > > > > The next steps: > > > > > > > > - better define the json structure > > > > - define how domains can provide custom test suites > > > > - define an actual reference domain and test suite (this will be a > very > > > > rigorous domain) > > > > - implement a reference client which can pass the reference domain's > > test > > > > suite > > > > > > > > At this point we have a client and a data specification, so now we > just > > > > define a device, browser, and OS spec and the clients will be able to > > use > > > > them. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sounds good. Do you think we could get some important aspects of > 2.0 > > > > > phrased into an abstract for upcoming conferences? > > > > > ApacheCon Europe and DevoXX (BE, possibly Morocco, too, both happen > > in > > > > > November) all have CFP till the end of this month, so approx. 2 > weeks > > > > > left;-) > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > So I think 1.0.3 is ready to go. Here is a link to the changes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP-164?jql=project%20%3D%20DMAP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.0.3%20Data%22 > > > > > > > > > > > > Im going to start prepping the release for a vote thread and I > > would > > > > like > > > > > > to get the vote thread out before the weekend so we have next > week > > to > > > > > vote > > > > > > and release. So feel free to comment, suggest additions, commit > > > > > additions, > > > > > > etc, now or during the official vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > After that, onto 2.0! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
