-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -1
I agree with Reza. My 2 cents on 2.0 to follow ASAP esjr On 2015-07-13 22:28, Werner Keil wrote: > All, > > Would anybody object if the /clients/w3c-ddr and /examples/w3c-ddr > folders are renamed to /clients/w3c and /examples/w3c? > > We could do a formal vote if that seems necessary, but after an > initial modularization and e.g. Reza's reply just earlier, it feels > safe to assume these 2 folders are of concern only to a few while a > few others work in different areas. > > As mentioned, work in the Apache Portals project and JSR 362 EG > brought up CC/PP support because this (W3C) standard is already > supported by the Portlet standard since 2.0. Just like DDR it is > another W3C standard, so while adding an extra /clients/w3c-ccpp > folder was possible, I would prefer putting W3C projects under a > folder common to all of them. > > As there are no Jenkins builds other than /data there should be no > impact on existing build scripts either. > > WDYT? Werner > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVpD/+AAoJEOxywXcFLKYc4loIAJ9Vy5JEYIJmOKNQ0H+DErDE Fpw8dhDJrwRxBuO2Z3mESPmCFiV12FrEvJ4hO6hc9yietPs5nG7cM3/WjItDRT8o Gp7Pcn75q+t3PjLoJmFHMP8l0P7pPlyLAHS9dkO1ApetZsj9hEIzknkMylTMxQTH XPouAyWC0gxSikgGFMLYpV/z8KqPsPND0H/WwKosf+4urThEXghwtRRW9+00pFgT Di6qQe0BgNuRgBBfvLF8o01dvpLxleWBizGcQIbL0I7bEFVfV6mwi6evwSR2Qd7Q 7nZIYE3DyVToibk+loar7OSfQ+2EtoSIeI2Pr+AkMnHlcXSbQrkr0Rxx8LZJRbg= =SQ+w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
