That would do, too. No "release" tag in SVN either, so from that I'd say it is also fine.
Still hope, more participate. While the W3C standards effort may seem isolated and "lonely" to some, it has a goal especially driven by requirements of the Java Portlet 3 EG and related Apache projects like Pluto. On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Reza Naghibi <re...@apache.org> wrote: > Yup... good catch. I guess I meant to say "preview". > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Stefan Seelmann <m...@stefan-seelmann.de> > wrote: > > > On 08/03/2015 06:13 PM, Reza Naghibi wrote: > > > I converted the 1.0 xml device data to 2.0 json. So given we now have a > > > reference client, reference domains, our device domain in 2.0, and > > > everything came together as designed, I think thats enough to say we > have > > > an alpha release (pre beta). > > > > Going into nitpicking mode: Even if called "alpha", the term "release" > > has a clear meaning at Apache [1]. Only the PMC in its entirety can do a > > release. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Stefan > > > > [1] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > >
