+1 (for Stefan's assessment ;-) While 2.0 might (including himself) by some be considered "Reza's playground" or "sandbox" Stefan is right and it goes along what I mentioned earlier about "community" driven Apache projects vs. "lone ranger" efforts just trying to use Apache as a form or accomplishment or certification;-|
I appreciate that e.g. the Core vocabulary was unspoilt in this translated form, but other than that "Snapshot" would have been a more appropriate term. I hope there was no tagging as "Alpha-release"? Thanks and Regards, Werner On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Stefan Seelmann <m...@stefan-seelmann.de> wrote: > On 08/03/2015 06:13 PM, Reza Naghibi wrote: > > I converted the 1.0 xml device data to 2.0 json. So given we now have a > > reference client, reference domains, our device domain in 2.0, and > > everything came together as designed, I think thats enough to say we have > > an alpha release (pre beta). > > Going into nitpicking mode: Even if called "alpha", the term "release" > has a clear meaning at Apache [1]. Only the PMC in its entirety can do a > release. > > Kind Regards, > Stefan > > [1] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >
