Good morning, to publish documentation like the one on http://directmemory.apache.org/ we used APT and xdoc Maven's format, not docbook.
best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Christoph Engelbert <[email protected]> wrote: > I worked with the docbook standard in a company before. It worked > very well for documentation of an SOAP webservice and was > "relatively" easy to customize in terms of layouts. > > So +1 from me for using docbook to create pdf and html from the > docbook standard xml. > > I found a really good xml editor with direct docbook support, just > need to search for it again :-) > > Cheers Chris > > Am 06.10.2012 22:36, schrieb Raffaele P. Guidi: >> Yep, it was docbook. I think it brings to extremely well done >> documentation. Do you guys think that it could be worth giving it a try? >> >> Ciao, >> R >> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You are welcome, thanks for getting involved :) of course adding docs to >>> the DM maven site is the preferred way even though I wouldn't say that we >>> are an excellence, when it comes to docs and probably an easier way to >>> write them would help. Has anyone proposals about it? I really like how the >>> spring framework is documented (I think it's done with a lucene tool, don't >>> remember exactly how it is called and my google karma tonight is low). >>> >>> Ciao, >>> R >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Christoph Engelbert >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hey guys, >>>> >>>> so the account creation was successful :-) Thanks for the given >>>> trust I'm totally proud. >>>> >>>> The first question is how to do documentation for Lightning? Is >>>> there a preferred way to document subprojects or do they get there >>>> own part on the main projects page (like it seems to be on the >>>> commons projects)? >>>> >>>> Cheers Chris >>>> >>> >
