I experienced docbook to publish MyBatis (formerly Apache iBATIS)
manuals (both pdf/html sites) and to generate them on my local machine
(2.3 GHz Intel Core i5, 4Gb 1333 MHz DDR3) required a laaaaaaaaarge
amount of time, so we migrated to Maven xdoc and reduced that time in
minutes.

And yes, it was part of the build via Maven plugin.

My 0.02 cents,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree but docbook and his toolsuite helps organizing ideas in a
> consistent reference document (well, a book). That should be differently
> organized than the site itself. See spring or hibernate or, if you want to
> stay closer to home, apache velocity documentation. They all use docbook
> and have great docs (not a cohincidence IMHO).
>
> Regards,
>     Raffaele
> Il giorno 08/ott/2012 14:09, "Olivier Lamy" <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>
>> could that be integrated in a maven site build ? Is there any maven
>> plugin for docbook ?
>> Because for javadoc maven is helpfull and well integrated for
>> deployment to directmemory.a.o
>>
>> And IMHO the most important is to write doc (not discussing on the
>> tool to do it :P )
>>
>> 2012/10/8 Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]>:
>> > Yeah I know, I'm proposing a change as I'm not 100% satisfied with it and
>> > Docbook really helps in building consistent documentation.
>> >
>> > What do you think about it?
>> >
>> > Ciao,
>> >     R
>> > Il giorno 08/ott/2012 11:35, "Simone Tripodi" <[email protected]>
>> ha
>> > scritto:
>> >
>> >> Good morning,
>> >>
>> >> to publish documentation like the one on
>> >> http://directmemory.apache.org/ we used APT and xdoc Maven's format,
>> >> not docbook.
>> >>
>> >> best,
>> >> -Simo
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> >> http://www.99soft.org/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Christoph Engelbert
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > I worked with the docbook standard in a company before. It worked
>> >> > very well for documentation of an SOAP webservice and was
>> >> > "relatively" easy to customize in terms of layouts.
>> >> >
>> >> > So +1 from me for using docbook to create pdf and html from the
>> >> > docbook standard xml.
>> >> >
>> >> > I found a really good xml editor with direct docbook support, just
>> >> > need to search for it again :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers Chris
>> >> >
>> >> > Am 06.10.2012 22:36, schrieb Raffaele P. Guidi:
>> >> >> Yep, it was docbook. I think it brings to extremely well done
>> >> >> documentation. Do you guys think that it could be worth giving it a
>> try?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Ciao,
>> >> >>     R
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <
>> >> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> You are welcome, thanks for getting involved :) of course adding
>> docs
>> >> to
>> >> >>> the DM maven site is the preferred way even though I wouldn't say
>> that
>> >> we
>> >> >>> are an excellence, when it comes to docs and probably an easier way
>> to
>> >> >>> write them would help. Has anyone proposals about it? I really like
>> >> how the
>> >> >>> spring framework is documented (I think it's done with a lucene
>> tool,
>> >> don't
>> >> >>> remember exactly how it is called and my google karma tonight is
>> low).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Ciao,
>> >> >>>     R
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Christoph Engelbert <
>> >> [email protected]>wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> Hey guys,
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> so the account creation was successful :-) Thanks for the given
>> >> >>>> trust I'm totally proud.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> The first question is how to do documentation for Lightning? Is
>> >> >>>> there a preferred way to document subprojects or do they get there
>> >> >>>> own part on the main projects page (like it seems to be on the
>> >> >>>> commons projects)?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Cheers Chris
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>

Reply via email to