Uhm simply nobody told me I could do it on my own, before... And it seems I
didn't read the manuals thoroughly :P
I'll do it directly, next month, promised, but would you do it for me this
last time (it's two o'clock in the morning I don't have enough brain right
now)?
Thanks,
R
Il giorno 11/set/2013 01:38, "Tim Williams" <[email protected]> ha
scritto:
> Hi Raffaele,
> Any of us are happy to submit it for you, but just curious if there's
> a permissions issue or something? Have you tried just checking out
> and committing directly?
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/board/
>
> Thanks,
> --tim
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is this month's report for DirectMemory would please someone file it
> > to the board?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raffaele
> >
> >
> > Apache DirectMemory - Sep 2013
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Apache DirectMemory is an off-heap cache implementation for the JVM
> >
> > * General Information
> > DirectMemory is being evaluated by project jackrabbit for integration of
> > off-heap
> > memory into OAK.
> > Another, more performant back-end implementation is being contributed by
> > noctarius
> >
> > * Issues
> > Development is not moving really fast and adoption is still quite limited
> > to other
> > apache projects - although more than some interesting integrations have
> been
> > contributed. It has to be said that DirectMemory is a niche product - its
> > target
> > is people and organizations that need to enable their application to
> handle
> > large
> > (gigabytes) quantities of objects into memory and it competes in the same
> > space
> > of terracotta, jboss, memcached and other big players with strong
> corporate
> > backing and sponsorship. We feel that we accomplished at least, being the
> > first
> > open source offheap cache implementation, the goal to bring big memory to
> > the
> > masses, forcing, in a way, companies to offer free tiers of commercial
> > products
> > (as bigmemory go). We feel that we are moving, although slowly, and we
> are
> > making things move.
> > Any help would be appreciated, though, in suggestions, spreading the
> word,
> > testing and facilitating the adoption of the platform
> >
> > * Releases
> > No releases since july 2012. Release 0.2 is planned for the end of the
> > month -
> > this will be the first one since we left incubation
>
