np, get some sleep:) Committed revision 44115. --tim
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]> wrote: > Uhm simply nobody told me I could do it on my own, before... And it seems I > didn't read the manuals thoroughly :P > > I'll do it directly, next month, promised, but would you do it for me this > last time (it's two o'clock in the morning I don't have enough brain right > now)? > > Thanks, > R > Il giorno 11/set/2013 01:38, "Tim Williams" <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > >> Hi Raffaele, >> Any of us are happy to submit it for you, but just curious if there's >> a permissions issue or something? Have you tried just checking out >> and committing directly? >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/board/ >> >> Thanks, >> --tim >> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > This is this month's report for DirectMemory would please someone file it >> > to the board? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Raffaele >> > >> > >> > Apache DirectMemory - Sep 2013 >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Apache DirectMemory is an off-heap cache implementation for the JVM >> > >> > * General Information >> > DirectMemory is being evaluated by project jackrabbit for integration of >> > off-heap >> > memory into OAK. >> > Another, more performant back-end implementation is being contributed by >> > noctarius >> > >> > * Issues >> > Development is not moving really fast and adoption is still quite limited >> > to other >> > apache projects - although more than some interesting integrations have >> been >> > contributed. It has to be said that DirectMemory is a niche product - its >> > target >> > is people and organizations that need to enable their application to >> handle >> > large >> > (gigabytes) quantities of objects into memory and it competes in the same >> > space >> > of terracotta, jboss, memcached and other big players with strong >> corporate >> > backing and sponsorship. We feel that we accomplished at least, being the >> > first >> > open source offheap cache implementation, the goal to bring big memory to >> > the >> > masses, forcing, in a way, companies to offer free tiers of commercial >> > products >> > (as bigmemory go). We feel that we are moving, although slowly, and we >> are >> > making things move. >> > Any help would be appreciated, though, in suggestions, spreading the >> word, >> > testing and facilitating the adoption of the platform >> > >> > * Releases >> > No releases since july 2012. Release 0.2 is planned for the end of the >> > month - >> > this will be the first one since we left incubation >>
