caseExactOrderingMatch integerOrderingMatch
When I comment out the appropriate ORDERING lines from my schema (snippits below) then it works fine.
Should I file a bug report on these?
I think they are valid schema rules (though I don't know schema very well - I wasn't the author of the schema files that I'm using)
Thanks,
Dan
Dan Armbrust wrote:
Now it is telling me that
javax.naming.NamingException: OID for name 'caseExactOrderingMatch' was not found within the OID registry
for the following names:
caseExactOrderingMatch integerOrderingMatch
Are these not supported, or am I still missing some schemas?
These stem from the following schema entries that I have:
# Integer - attributetype (1.3.6.1.4.1.2114.108.1.4.6 NAME 'tsInteger' EQUALITY integerMatch ORDERING integerOrderingMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27)
# Directory String - UTF 8 / Unicode - case sensitive attributetype (1.3.6.1.4.1.2114.108.1.4.4 NAME 'tsCaseSensitiveDirectoryString' EQUALITY caseExactMatch ORDERING caseExactOrderingMatch SUBSTR caseExactSubstringsMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15)
