Peter, > The changes look like they help simplify usage of MINA in simple > scenarios.. the examples are certainly much simpler, but for users > that might have a more complex integration, they seem to be somewhat > of a step backwards
I haven't looked at the code, but having seen the dialog so far, you
certainly make a strong case for vetoing the changes until your concerns
are resolved.
Perhaps a set of convenience classes for MINA would address ease of use
without sacrificing more advanced use.
--- Noel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
