Yeah - It looks like they are on fire. Their Java install totally rocks. I used to have to blow away the gjc stuff on Fedora. They totally took care of it. See
http://www.city-fan.org/tips/JpackageJava Now it's super easy to switch between different versions of packages installed. All the RPMs are hosted by JPackage. See here for instance: http://www.jpackage.org/browser/browse.php?jppversion=5.0 They have other ways of browsing as well. / various views. The RPMS are also in Yum repositories. So if you have Yum, you just need to type yum install apacheds and done. Want to uninstall: yum uninstall apacheds and done. Want to reinstall yum install apacheds and done. OK OK OK - Gotta love it though! Cheers, - Ole --- Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds cool looks like these guys are doing some > good work here. > > BTW where would these RPMs go? > > Thanks for keeping us posted. > Alex > > Ole Ersoy wrote: > > Note: forwarded message attached. > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Subject: > > Re: [JPackage-discuss] James & Apache-DS, was > Tomcat Jpackage > > From: > > Ralph Apel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: > > Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:34:58 +0200 > > To: > > Discussion about JPackage project > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: > > Discussion about JPackage project > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Being on sick leave, I now have some package work > in progress:-) > > > > tl-netty2-1.9.2 > > mina-1.0.0 > > apacheds-shared-0.9.5.3 > > apacheds-daemon-1.0.0 > > apacheds-1.0.0 > > > > as well as a related fix to > > plexus-i18n-1.0 > > > > and the addition of > > maven2-default-skin-1.0 > > maven2-classic-skin-1.0 > > maven2-stylus-skin-1.0 > > in order to get the "mvn site" working. > > > > For JPP-1.7 there is a problem though: > > mina (and with it all the rest) rely on > javax.net.ssl.SSLEngine, > > which is not available in java-1.4.2. > > > > I am trying to patch everything such as to build a > DS without SSL > > support for JPP-1.7, and a full build for JPP-5.0. > > > > And will need a few days more, of course. > > > > Cheers, > > Ralph > > > > > > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 10:19 -0700, Ole Ersoy > wrote: > >> Wow - Awesome! > >> > >> I'm cross posting this on the Directory dev list. > >> > >> I know Emmanuel is very excited about this as > well. > >> > >> I'll have a look at the dependencies ASAP. I'm > still > >> reading the Tomcat RPM to make sure I understand > the > >> JPackage process, FHS layout, relinking, etc. > >> > >> My long term goal is to have a Mojo (Maven Pojo) > that > >> understands the JPackage RPM standards and > generates a > >> compliant RPM. That way Tomcat, > >> James, and ADS, as well as other Apache projects > can > >> just plug it in and have the JPackage > automatically > >> generated. > >> > >> Thanks again for letting us know. I'm certain > the > >> whole directory team is going to love this. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> - Ole > >> > >> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >>> I feel very positively wrt James and DS. > >>> > >>> I haven't looked into James, but already tried > to > >>> take steps towards DS. > >>> Some Requires are already packaged or at least > >>> advanced: > >>> AFAIR > >>> asn1 (1.7/generic/SRPMS.free) > >>> mina (1.7/generic/SRPMS.free and > >>> 5.0/generic/SRPMS.free) > >>> nlog4j (1.7/generic/SRPMS.free) > >>> slf4j (1.7/generic/SRPMS.free) > >>> > >>> as well as (started, unfinished, unpublished) > >>> ldap-shared > >>> > >>> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > >>> Von: Ole Ersoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2006 02:09 > >>> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Betreff: [JPackage-discuss] Tomcat Jpackage > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm studying the Tomcat JPackage to see how I > can > >>> make > >>> similar packages for Apache James and Apache > >>> Directory > >>> Server. > >>> > >>> Is there a reason for compiling Tomcat, rather > than > >>> just repackaging the binaries? > >>> > >>> I was going to go with the latter, but figured > I'd > >>> ask > >>> first in case there are any hangups that others > have > >>> experienced? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> - Ole > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > __________________________________________________ > >>> Do You Yahoo!? > >>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > >>> protection around > >>> http://mail.yahoo.com > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> JPackage-discuss mailing list > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >> > https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> JPackage-discuss mailing list > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >> > https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss > >> > >> > __________________________________________________ > >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> JPackage-discuss mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > JPackage-discuss mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
