Re: mina 1.0 and java5

[Alex Karasulu]

peter royal wrote:
is there interest in an official mina 1.0 build not requiring the 
util.concurrent backport?

this would be slightly more than what can be done by whacking the 
backport import prefixes.. all data structures that have replacements in 
j.u.concurrent will be removed and replaced with their jdk-based 
counterparts.

aside from Apache DS using MINA, I get the impression that pretty much 
everyone else is on java5?

I don't understand what this means.  Do you mean removing the usage of 
the backport classes?

Right now 1.0 usage requires the use of classes from the 
edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.* packages.  You mean to 
say we make 1.0.x for switch to using java.util.concurrent?

Alex