+1 best regards, John
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 20:55 -0800, peter royal wrote: > is there interest in an official mina 1.0 build not requiring the > util.concurrent backport? > > this would be slightly more than what can be done by whacking the > backport import prefixes.. all data structures that have replacements > in j.u.concurrent will be removed and replaced with their jdk-based > counterparts. > > aside from Apache DS using MINA, I get the impression that pretty > much everyone else is on java5? > > -pete >
