Hello,

I have a shiny new Authenticator implementation running (mostly, I think) and came across a comment that I think should be changed:

--- AbstractAuthenticator.java  2007-02-21 16:25:53.000000000 -0500
+++ AbstractAuthenticator.java.new      2007-04-16 00:40:12.000000000 -0400
@@ -144,13 +144,14 @@
     /**
* Returns a new [EMAIL PROTECTED] LdapPrincipal} instance whose value is the specified
      * <tt>name</tt>.
-     *
+     *
+ * This method is available for custom Authenticator implementations.
+        *
      * @param name the distinguished name of the X.500 principal
      * @param authenticationLeve
      * @return the principal for the <tt>name</tt>
      * @throws NamingException if there is a problem parsing <tt>name</tt>
      */
-    // does not seem to be used
protected static LdapPrincipal createLdapPrincipal( String name, AuthenticationLevel authenticationLeve )
         throws NamingException
     {

I could not create a custom Authenticator without createLdapPrincipal().
Of course, unless I can. :-) (then please show me how)

Cheers.

--
http://www.ScheduleWorld.com/
Free Google Calendar synchronization with Outlook, Evolution,
cell phones, BlackBerry, PalmOS, Exchange, Mozilla, Thunderbird,
Pocket PC/Windows Mobile. Also sync tasks, notes and contacts!
WebDAV, vfreebusy, RSS, LDAP, iCalendar, iTIP, iMIP support.

Reply via email to