Enrique Rodriguez a écrit :
On 5/18/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/18/07, Enrique Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> PIDs must have gone in at least 1.5 years ago, when we did the first
> prototype with OSGi. They are not new. In fact, that's part of the
> reason the fqpn needed updating.
I thought you had that in a branch. I did not know all this OSGi
experimentation
was going on in the trunk code outside of isolated modules like those
under
the
osgi subdirectory.
"OSGi experimentation ... going on in the trunk code" was limited to
setting a single String constant for PID so we could do dynamic
re-config and possibly a String for the service name, so it could be
identified in logging and GUI's, but the display name was useful
outside of the OSGi work.
Enrique
I think it was done last year, while the two OSGi sub-projects have been
created. I guess it remained as is until now...
Is it a big deal ? A soon as we keep a track of what those PID are good
for (means : doco), I think we are safe with keeping them in the code, no ?
Emmanuel
