On Nov 11, 2007 3:35 PM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The dependency is OK in server-unit but not in protocol-dns. If you > want to do over the wire tests do it in server-unit. This is the > point to the module: it's there specifically for over the wire > integration tests.
I'm confused because it seems both you and Emm approved the addition of the commons NTP client to the protocol-ntp module, which is used in exactly the same way I was intending to use 'dnsjava', namely with over-the-wire NTP tests. So then, the NTP client and test(s) should be moved to 'server-unit'? In which case we're back to a scalability problem w.r.t. deps in server-unit. Or is it the case that the dep in protocol-ntp is acceptable because NTP doesn't use the backend DIT? Be assured, my intention here has nothing to with creating a "standalone product" but rather the generally-accepted principle of loose-coupling. Enrique
