On Nov 13, 2007 11:47 PM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > You are being overly cautious on the wrong front here. If this client > code is just used for tests (with test scope) then the clients will > not be > packaged with the product. > > I don't know if I expressed myself well enough but do you see what I mean?
Of course I understand the clients will not be packaged with the product. What I'm trying to avoid is breaking the build by having integration tests using kerberos-client fail, because the kerberos-client is unstable. > ... > bugs if your tests flush them out. You are doing great by adding > tests for existing features. You are not adding new features without > tests, so there is no reason to keep your effort in a sandbox. Tests > are good things which should be given more leeway in the review > process. I agree tests should be given more leeway. Enrique
