On Nov 14, 2007 2:33 PM, Enrique Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 13, 2007 11:47 PM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > You are being overly cautious on the wrong front here. If this client > > code is just used for tests (with test scope) then the clients will > > not be > > packaged with the product. > > > > I don't know if I expressed myself well enough but do you see what I mean? > > Of course I understand the clients will not be packaged with the > product.
Cool. > What I'm trying to avoid is breaking the build by having > integration tests using kerberos-client fail, because the > kerberos-client is unstable. Yeah I know you want to branch and this is a great gesture. Thanks! I was trying to point out that creating the branches outside of your sandbox is OK if you like. I guess it makes no difference either way since we can access both: it's a minor connotation saying your branch is not new private work requiring a VOTE to merge it in from the sandbox. Alex
