+1 too, of course. Let's unify this between projects.
I think we can simply drop the current 'tags' folder and then move 'releases' to 'tags'. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > So far, we don't have a 'release' element?. All we have is 'branches', > 'tags', and 'trunk' (+ trunk-with-dependencies...) > > It would be good to stick to this convention. > So +1 to move to 'tags' instead of 'relase' for studio. > > > Felix Knecht wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Before doing wrong I think to remember we decided to have no longer a >> releases tree beside the trunk/tags/branches but >> putting release tags to tags tree. For studio this is not yet the case >> (see diff needed to patch). >> >> Index: pom.xml >> =================================================================== >> - --- pom.xml (revision 696222) >> +++ pom.xml (working copy) >> @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ >> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> >> <artifactId>maven-release-plugin</artifactId> >> <configuration> >> - - <tagBase> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/releases/</tagBase> >> + <tagBase> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/tags/</tagBase> >> </configuration> >> </plugin> >> <plugin> >> >> Regards >> Felix >> >> PS: >> At least this saves me from the studio/sutdio-plugin tagging problem ATM >> ;-) >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAkjQ2dcACgkQ2lZVCB08qHFDKgCg5YJN8J9zpnh9VdOJdLBZuYLf >> tEIAn18kRctRzTPtKIkTcepH79T0U2T2 >> =g0Rw >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> > > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
