Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb: > Hi Felix, > > Maybe this is because our current release process is done by hand, by > me and I have absolutely no idea what are the prerequisites of the scm > section of the pom. > > I'd love to see the whole release process completely automated, but I > don't know if we can use the release plugin to release Studio because > of the Eclipse weird things we need to do... I think it should be possible as we can also create the nightly dists by maven. Where do you see the problems caused by Eclipse?
Felix > > WDYT ? > > P-A > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb: > > +1 too, of course. > > > > Let's unify this between projects. > > > > I think we can simply drop the current 'tags' folder and then move > 'releases' to 'tags'. > > I think so too. > > But there's another problem we need to solve for the next release. > Look > at the <scm> section of the to poms [1][2] > [2] is the one I was keen to release. It contains the tagged URL > whereas > [1] contains the trunk as URL. Maybe this is an issue of the release > process of studio? > > Regards > Felix > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/releases/1.2.0/pom.xml > [2] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/tags/1.0.0/pom.xml > > > > > > Regards, > > Pierre-Arnaud > > > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > > > So far, we don't have a 'release' element?. All we have is > 'branches', 'tags', and 'trunk' (+ trunk-with-dependencies...) > > > > It would be good to stick to this convention. > > So +1 to move to 'tags' instead of 'relase' for studio. > > > > > > Felix Knecht wrote: > > > > Before doing wrong I think to remember we decided to have no > longer a > > releases tree beside the trunk/tags/branches but > > putting release tags to tags tree. For studio this is not yet > the case > > (see diff needed to patch). > > > > Index: pom.xml > > =================================================================== > > --- pom.xml (revision 696222) > > +++ pom.xml (working copy) > > @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ > > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > > <artifactId>maven-release-plugin</artifactId> > > <configuration> > > - > > > > <tagBase>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/releases/</tagBase> > > + > > > <tagBase>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/studio/tags/</tagBase> > > </configuration> > > </plugin> > > <plugin> > > > > Regards > > Felix > > > > PS: > > At least this saves me from the studio/sutdio-plugin tagging problem > > ATM ;-) > > > -- > > -- > > cordialement, regards, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.iktek.com <http://www.iktek.com> <http://www.iktek.com> > > directory.apache.org <http://directory.apache.org> > <http://directory.apache.org> > > > > > >
