Ok. you're right.

I think we're fine now... :)

Thanks Felix.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

PS: I'm preparing another mail about another Maven build optimization (since
we're at it). ;)


On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> >     What is about the artifact copying stuff?
> >
> >
> > In the StudioEclipseMojo, yeah, I think we can remove it. However, we
> > still need the StudioCopyEclipseDependencyMojo.
> >
> >
> >     Do you want to do this via the dependency plugin or leave it the
> >     way it is (studio-plugin)?
> >
> >
> > Actually no, because there's no way to use any kind of specification
> > like "(nonscoped 'provided' only)" for the list of dependencies to
> > copy. So I think we need to stick to what is done and works right now.
> > Otherwise, we'll need to specify our dependencies twice... :(
> >
> Your closer to the 'new' build process than I am. If you think it's
> better to leave it as it is now we do so.
> So the studio-plugin has suffered now all the modifications needed or do
> you see more to improve/fix?
>
> > WDYT ?
> >
> > P-A
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to