Ok. you're right. I think we're fine now... :)
Thanks Felix. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud PS: I'm preparing another mail about another Maven build optimization (since we're at it). ;) On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot schrieb: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > What is about the artifact copying stuff? > > > > > > In the StudioEclipseMojo, yeah, I think we can remove it. However, we > > still need the StudioCopyEclipseDependencyMojo. > > > > > > Do you want to do this via the dependency plugin or leave it the > > way it is (studio-plugin)? > > > > > > Actually no, because there's no way to use any kind of specification > > like "(nonscoped 'provided' only)" for the list of dependencies to > > copy. So I think we need to stick to what is done and works right now. > > Otherwise, we'll need to specify our dependencies twice... :( > > > Your closer to the 'new' build process than I am. If you think it's > better to leave it as it is now we do so. > So the studio-plugin has suffered now all the modifications needed or do > you see more to improve/fix? > > > WDYT ? > > > > P-A > > > > > >