On 1/19/11 4:39 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:

Here we keep other branch specific svn:externals folders that
reference project branches in their respective areas under svn. We can
use a convention like<branch-name>-with-dependencies for such link
folders on branches. This may however be redundant, so maybe we can
just use the<branch-name>    by itself. It's already understood to be a
"link folder" because of it's location. WDYT?

I'm wondering if we should not create a meta-project for apacheds. It's a bit 
painfull to have to co trunk-wih-dependencies :/
What is a meta-project?

Well, instead of having a trunk-with-dependencies in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/directory/apacheds/, I'd rather prefer having a http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/directory/trunk that points to all the sub-projects. I guess that it's what you proposed with the generic trunk.

Also the problem is that apacheds is the main project, but the trunk-with-dependencies is also in apacheds, which is a bit troublesome for new comers.
We should also require a branch log file in this branches folder to
chronicle what we've creates and deleted over time an why. Subversion
log will show this too so this may also be redundant but it's nice to
just see this info via http without having to run svn log or sift
through changes. WDYT?

Well, I'd rather depend on svn logs. They will be up to date, all the time :)

This was something done before to know what was deleted. It helps a
bit as an index in case you want to get back something u delete but
cannot remember the name.
Yeah, but it's never updated, unless someone does a check on all the commits, a painful task :/


--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Reply via email to