On 19 janv. 2011, at 23:14, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 1/19/11 9:09 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >>> >>> Exactly! The idea is to remove this and have a single one. I don't care if >>> it's: >>> >>> (1) http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/trunk >>> (2) http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/trunks >>> (3) http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/all-trunks >>> (4) http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/all >>> >>> I just wanted to inform y'all about it or agree upon it together and >>> set it up. I could just set it up and we can change it if need be. >>> Then we can all check out from here to have all the trunk projects in >>> scope. Another question might be why do we need to do this all of a >>> sudden? >> >> It doesn't matter too much. At this point, it will provide a single point >> where to get all the sources from, and this is good. >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/trunks sounds OK. > > OK I created this one so we can get started on the refactoring > tomorrow. However there's one issue that perhaps Pierre might lend a > hand with. > > I noties that studio/libraries/shared exists as an external link. I'm > wondering how the studio build can cope with getting rid of this so we > might just have shared at the top level as a peer folder of studio? > > Thoughts?
Trunks sounds pretty good to me too. I've checked out this and I'm now launching a new build with a clean M2 repo (all previous 'directory' artifacts being removed). The 'studio/libraries/shared' external link can go away I think now that we have this top level element project. I'm wondering if we couldn't add a few profiles for building only a sub-section of this giant checkout (apacheds only, or shared+apacheds together for example). >>> The idea is svn log, logs everything. It might be nice not to see a >>> lot of log messages and save some bandwidth by just listing your >>> deleted branch when done with it into this file. >> >> I know. The file has been updated last year, but I was the only one to do >> so. I'm pretty sure that it will be the same in the future, and even me, I'm >> quite sure I'll forgot to add the branches I delete :) > > Yeah I hear ya - I'm going to follow this convention myself and you > will not be the only one. If it does not work out no big deal we can > just delete the file and abandon if you like. > > -- > Alex Karasulu > My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ > Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org > Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org > To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
