On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Alex Karasulu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Felix Knecht <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/01/2011 07:33 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >>> >>> We seem to have a lot of high level projects/components appearing [0]. >>> Perhaps we can consolidate some of them. >>> >>> We might have a top level site/manuals/documentation area where >>> apacheds-manuals can go. Other manuals may arrise as well. Seems samples >>> and >>> skins can go under manuals? >>> >>> We have a number of build tooling and resource projects as well as a >>> resources under the project project [1]. >>> >>> How about consolidating a little like so? >>> >>> Manuals/Documentation: >>> - apacheds-manuals >>> - samples >>> - skins >>> >>> Resources >>> - [1] >>> - checkstyle-configurations >>> >>> Tooling: >>> - studio-plugin >>> - junit-addons >> >> +1 >> >>> Triplesec => Deceased ? >> >> I didn't took part during the incubation phase of the directory project, so >> I don't know if it's possible to let the Triplesec just decease or if the >> decease needs a formal process. > > We never defined a formal process but it's been a long time since we > worked on it. If we revive we'll rewrite this piece all over from > scratch. > >> If it can just decease: >> +1 >> > > Go for it. > >> BTW >> What do you exactly mean by decease? >> - Let it where it is but don't touch it anymore >> - Move it somewhere to the attic > > Yeah this is synonymous with the attic.
But the important question is (and I think that's what Felix means), if we want to move it into the Directory Project's own 'deceased' folder, or move it to the official Apache Attic [1][2]. Kind Regards, Stefan [1] http://attic.apache.org/ [2] http://attic.apache.org/process.html
