On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Alex Karasulu <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Felix Knecht <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 02/01/2011 07:33 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >>>> >>>> We seem to have a lot of high level projects/components appearing [0]. >>>> Perhaps we can consolidate some of them. >>>> >>>> We might have a top level site/manuals/documentation area where >>>> apacheds-manuals can go. Other manuals may arrise as well. Seems samples >>>> and >>>> skins can go under manuals? >>>> >>>> We have a number of build tooling and resource projects as well as a >>>> resources under the project project [1]. >>>> >>>> How about consolidating a little like so? >>>> >>>> Manuals/Documentation: >>>> - apacheds-manuals >>>> - samples >>>> - skins >>>> >>>> Resources >>>> - [1] >>>> - checkstyle-configurations >>>> >>>> Tooling: >>>> - studio-plugin >>>> - junit-addons >>> >>> +1 >>> >>>> Triplesec => Deceased ? >>> >>> I didn't took part during the incubation phase of the directory project, so >>> I don't know if it's possible to let the Triplesec just decease or if the >>> decease needs a formal process. >> >> We never defined a formal process but it's been a long time since we >> worked on it. If we revive we'll rewrite this piece all over from >> scratch. >> >>> If it can just decease: >>> +1 >>> >> >> Go for it. >> >>> BTW >>> What do you exactly mean by decease? >>> - Let it where it is but don't touch it anymore >>> - Move it somewhere to the attic >> >> Yeah this is synonymous with the attic. > > But the important question is (and I think that's what Felix means), > if we want to move it into the Directory Project's own 'deceased' > folder, or move it to the official Apache Attic [1][2].
I don't think this is necessary. We'll probably bring it back to life after we can get the house in order. In fact let's just leave it where it is - not like it's getting in the way right now. Thanks, Alex
