On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Alex Karasulu <[email protected]> wrote: > Create new packages for extra controls, the 2nd class of optional > controls of which we have the following for replication and ppolicy: > > PasswordPolicy > SyncDoneValue > SyncInfoValue > SyncModifyDn > SyncRequestValue > SyncStateValue
I just wonder why those controls are named "...Value"? Sorry if this was already discussed and I missed it. > Bases: > [PRIVATE PACKAGES] > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.extended.impl > > Subpackages: > [PRIVATE PACKAGES] > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.ppolicy > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncInfoValue > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncDoneValue > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncRequestValue > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncStateValue > org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncModifyDn Do we really need different packages for all the SyncRepl controls? When reading RFC 4533 the syncInfoValue is not a control, but the value of an immediate response message. Should it be put to the 'contols' package then? Kind Regards, Stefan
