On 2/4/11 12:14 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Alex Karasulu<[email protected]> wrote:
Create new packages for extra controls, the 2nd class of optional
controls of which we have the following for replication and ppolicy:
PasswordPolicy
SyncDoneValue
SyncInfoValue
SyncModifyDn
SyncRequestValue
SyncStateValue
I just wonder why those controls are named "...Value"? Sorry if this
was already discussed and I missed it.
It hasn't been discussed, it's the name those controls have in RFC 4533 :
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4533.txt, par 2.2, 2.3, etc
Bases:
[PRIVATE PACKAGES]
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.extended.impl
Subpackages:
[PRIVATE PACKAGES]
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.ppolicy
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncInfoValue
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncDoneValue
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncRequestValue
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncStateValue
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncModifyDn
Do we really need different packages for all the SyncRepl controls?
Nope. Alex just merged them all in a extra.controls package.
When reading RFC 4533 the syncInfoValue is not a control, but the
value of an immediate response message. Should it be put to the
'contols' package then?
Very good remark. I have no valid answer right now...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
