Review Package Names
--------------------
Key: DIRSHARED-97
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-97
Project: Directory Shared
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Stefan Seelmann
Fix For: 1.0.0-RC1
The package names should be reviewed. Package names are not consistent and IMHO
too long. So here I just put some questions and ideas.
Example from ldap-model:
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.name.Dn
- Do we need the *shared* in package names? I think we can remove it,
everything that doesn't start with o.a.d.studio or o.a.d.server in the name is
implicitly a 'shared' package.
- Should we keep the *model* in package names? While I understand that during
refactoring it's easier to see the model packages, it isn't common in other
APIs.
The result could be: org.apache.directory.ldap.name.Dn
Example from ldap-client-api:
org.apache.directory.ldap.client.api.LdapConnection
- Do we need the 'client.api' in package names? I think we can remove it,
everything with o.a.d.ldap in the name is implicitly the LDAP API.
The result could be: org.apache.directory.ldap.LdapConnection
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
