[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994271#comment-12994271
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSHARED-97:
--------------------------------------------
org.apache.directory.ldap.name.Dn sounds good. No need to repeat the 'shared'
part as this package is already in a jars with this name.
Btw, we should now switch to ldap-api instead of shared. Shared does not mean
anything...
> Review Package Names
> --------------------
>
> Key: DIRSHARED-97
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-97
> Project: Directory Shared
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Stefan Seelmann
> Fix For: 1.0.0-RC1
>
>
> The package names should be reviewed. Package names are not consistent and
> IMHO too long. So here I just put some questions and ideas.
> Example from ldap-model:
> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.name.Dn
> - Do we need the *shared* in package names? I think we can remove it,
> everything that doesn't start with o.a.d.studio or o.a.d.server in the name
> is implicitly a 'shared' package.
> - Should we keep the *model* in package names? While I understand that during
> refactoring it's easier to see the model packages, it isn't common in other
> APIs.
> The result could be: org.apache.directory.ldap.name.Dn
> Example from ldap-client-api:
> org.apache.directory.ldap.client.api.LdapConnection
> - Do we need the 'client.api' in package names? I think we can remove it,
> everything with o.a.d.ldap in the name is implicitly the LDAP API.
> The result could be: org.apache.directory.ldap.LdapConnection
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
