Hi Stefan, On 7 mars 2011, at 22:11, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> Sure. > > I wanted to fix the legal issues, but I think I won't have time to > work on it before next weekend, and event then I'm not sure, sorry. Do you remember what kind of issues it was? I thought we had already fixed legal issues with the release of M1 and the various additions of 3rd parties licenses and attributions in the Notice files. > Another thing to check is that the distribution packages include all > dependencies. Yeah, that's also something I wanted to test before the release. Especially a standard logging implementation like Log4J (letting the ability to be replaced by another specific implementation if users prefer some other). > A last thing is that I'm confused about that new > shared-ldap-client-all module which shades lot of shared modules but > also 3rd party dependencies. I don't see what it is good for. I agree, shading all shared modules is a good idea but I'm not so sure about 3rd parties dependencies too. I guess the resulting jar should contain "shared"-only classes. I'll look into that if it's ok with everyone. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud > Kind regards > Stefan > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I was just wondering it wouldn't be a good time to schedule the M2 release. >> >> Heavy refactoring have been done since the last M1 milestone, trunk is >> pretty stable now and the current activity is pretty low. >> >> Before starting a new phase of heavy coding, it might be a good idea to get >> the M2 release in the hands of our users. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Regards, >> Pierre-Arnaud >> >> >> >>
