Please see DIRSHARED-99 and DIRSHARED-100.
On Mar 8, 2011 9:18 AM, "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On 7 mars 2011, at 22:11, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > >> Sure. >> >> I wanted to fix the legal issues, but I think I won't have time to >> work on it before next weekend, and event then I'm not sure, sorry. > > Do you remember what kind of issues it was? > I thought we had already fixed legal issues with the release of M1 and the various additions of 3rd parties licenses and attributions in the Notice files. > >> Another thing to check is that the distribution packages include all >> dependencies. > > Yeah, that's also something I wanted to test before the release. Especially a standard logging implementation like Log4J (letting the ability to be replaced by another specific implementation if users prefer some other). > >> A last thing is that I'm confused about that new >> shared-ldap-client-all module which shades lot of shared modules but >> also 3rd party dependencies. I don't see what it is good for. > > I agree, shading all shared modules is a good idea but I'm not so sure about 3rd parties dependencies too. > I guess the resulting jar should contain "shared"-only classes. > > I'll look into that if it's ok with everyone. > > Regards, > Pierre-Arnaud > > >> Kind regards >> Stefan >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I was just wondering it wouldn't be a good time to schedule the M2 release. >>> >>> Heavy refactoring have been done since the last M1 milestone, trunk is pretty stable now and the current activity is pretty low. >>> >>> Before starting a new phase of heavy coding, it might be a good idea to get the M2 release in the hands of our users. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Pierre-Arnaud >>> >>> >>> >>> >
