On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi guys, > > we have a little issue in the way we handle a MODDN operation during > replication. > > AFAICT, we use a special control to pass some informations to the consumer, > so that it can proceed with the Move and/or Rename. > > I don't think it's necessary. We just have to send a SearchResultEntry > containing the modified entry, with a Modify type, and the consumer will be > able to determinate which kind of MODDN has been used (and if the old RDN > has been remove dor not. > > That sounds very reasonable. I've always wondered why we needed this additional control. Maybe there's something I am missing is what I was thinking. > This will work because the consumer always have the previous entry locally, > and will retrieve it using the entryUuid. > > We don't need the control. > > That would be great because this is making us non-standard, deviating from the protocol. Best Regards, -- Alex
