Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi guys,
we have a little issue in the way we handle a MODDN operation during
replication.
AFAICT, we use a special control to pass some informations to the
consumer, so that it can proceed with the Move and/or Rename.
I don't think it's necessary. We just have to send a SearchResultEntry
containing the modified entry, with a Modify type, and the consumer will
be able to determinate which kind of MODDN has been used (and if the old
RDN has been remove dor not.
Yes, exactly.
That sounds very reasonable. I've always wondered why we needed this
additional control. Maybe there's something I am missing is what I was thinking.
This will work because the consumer always have the previous entry
locally, and will retrieve it using the entryUuid.
We don't need the control.
That would be great because this is making us non-standard, deviating from the
protocol.
Best Regards,
-- Alex
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
