Hi Emmanuel, On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > I may be a bit rusty, but AFAICT, we got rid of the oneLevel index, as we > can use the Rdn index to do the same job.
No, not yet, see below. > I question the need of the subLevel index now : can't we use the RDN index > for the very same purpose ? IMO, but I may be wrong, it would be just a > matter of adding some extra information in the RDN index (ie, the number of > descendant for each entry) and to define a cursor that do a recursive > descent into the RDN index. Yes, I'm sure that is possible and that is what I did for the HBase partition. But its not done yet. I started a branch [1] to experiment with it but don't have time to continue. Feel free to pick up the changes there or start a new refactoring. Kind Regards, Stefan [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/branches/one-sub-level-index-removal/
