On 10/5/11 9:35 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny<[email protected]> wrote:
I may be a bit rusty, but AFAICT, we got rid of the oneLevel index, as we
can use the Rdn index to do the same job.
No, not yet, see below.
I question the need of the subLevel index now : can't we use the RDN index
for the very same purpose ? IMO, but I may be wrong, it would be just a
matter of adding some extra information in the RDN index (ie, the number of
descendant for each entry) and to define a cursor that do a recursive
descent into the RDN index.
Yes, I'm sure that is possible and that is what I did for the HBase
partition. But its not done yet. I started a branch [1] to experiment
with it but don't have time to continue. Feel free to pick up the
changes there or start a new refactoring.
Okie, thanks !
I will pursue the experiment.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
