Le 5/1/13 12:25 PM, Radu Creanga a écrit : > -1 for including the pwdModify as part of the connection API and don't care > for the move from extra to core. > > None of you have heard from me before and I'm not sure my vote can count > for anything, but I hope the comments will. There is no formal vote, so your opinion is certainly valuable.
This is why I pushed the mail here (alhought I should have said "I'd like to " instead of "I will". > > PwdModify is an extended request that is optional for a directory server - > AD for example does not support it, at least not out of the box. But, by > including it as part of the connection API you're creating the wrong > impression that it is a standard/universal operation such as add, modify, > delete, search, etc. I will think again about my proposal. I will start by moving the startTLS extended request, which is supported by all the servers. Regarding the pwdModify extended request, I can provide an utility class that make it easiers to send it to the servers that support it. Thanks for your feedback, this is certainly good food for thoughts ! -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
