On 1 mai 2013, at 16:43, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 5/1/13 12:25 PM, Radu Creanga a écrit : >> -1 for including the pwdModify as part of the connection API and don't care >> for the move from extra to core. >> >> None of you have heard from me before and I'm not sure my vote can count >> for anything, but I hope the comments will. > There is no formal vote, so your opinion is certainly valuable. > > This is why I pushed the mail here (alhought I should have said "I'd > like to " instead of "I will". >> >> PwdModify is an extended request that is optional for a directory server - >> AD for example does not support it, at least not out of the box. But, by >> including it as part of the connection API you're creating the wrong >> impression that it is a standard/universal operation such as add, modify, >> delete, search, etc. > > I will think again about my proposal. > > I will start by moving the startTLS extended request, which is supported > by all the servers. > > Regarding the pwdModify extended request, I can provide an utility class > that make it easiers to send it to the servers that support it. > > Thanks for your feedback, this is certainly good food for thoughts ! > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
